The opinions, the patterns, and the posts behind them.
13 models tracked6 vendors · Source: X
143 classified mentions · 8 excluded (1 cannot determine)Newest post Oct 5, 2026
THE BIG PICTURE
How the conversation is changing
PositiveNegative
28%positive (40)
29%negative (41)
57 neutral · 5 mixedNo comparable previous period
Share of classified mentions · UTCCollected opinions, unweighted by likes or reposts
READ THE EVIDENCE
In their own words
positiveJev confidence 98.0%
ANTHROPIC RAN THE SAME SPIDER TASK AGAINST TWO MODELS AND FABLE 5.1 FINISHED IN 6 MINUTES WHILE OPUS 5.5 WAS STILL DEBUGGING AT MINUTE 10
same prompt. same repo. clock +30
both models got one task - build an animated 3d spider in three.js, 8 jointed legs, walking gait, 60 fps, https://t.co/1TAAaIByVr https://t.co/JO4ZRBY5Fk
Jev classification details
Overall: Positive98.0% confidence
Praise, endorsement, or a favorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
98.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
2.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
0.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Positive
98.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
99.0%
Speed
Positive
94.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Positive
90.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 95.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
negativeJev confidence 47.0%
@himanshustwts they are not giving the latest models opus 5.5/fable 5.1 or mythos. The companies might as well use chinese models
Jev classification details
Overall: Negative47.0% confidence
Criticism, disappointment, or an unfavorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
2.0%
Negative
56.0%
Neutral
27.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
12.0%
Cannot determine
3.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Negative
47.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
99.0%
Speed
Not discussed
100.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Not discussed
100.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 84.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
positiveJev confidence 54.0%
Claude is #1 in every category 🏆 Arena's Oct 5 Agent Arena snapshot has Claude Fable 5.1 (Max) leading Code and Work and Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Max) leading Chat, while GPT-6 Astra (Max) sits #2 in Code and #4 in Work and Chat. https://t.co/49I2vYjQxd
Jev classification details
Overall: Positive54.0% confidence
Praise, endorsement, or a favorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
63.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
37.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
0.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Positive
54.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
100.0%
Speed
Not discussed
100.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Positive
64.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 75.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
neutralJev confidence 52.0%
Claude Fable 5.1 + ChatGPT Astra coding in parallel?
Give each agent its own Git worktree:
my-app/ → You
my-app-auth/ → Agent 1
my-app-api/ → Agent 2
Same repo. Different branches. Zero conflicts.
git worktree is made for the AI coding era.
Jev classification details
Overall: Neutral52.0% confidence
The model is discussed in this dimension without a clear positive or negative opinion.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
31.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
60.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
8.0%
Cannot determine
1.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Neutral
52.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
94.0%
Speed
Not discussed
100.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Positive
31.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 96.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
neutralJev confidence 89.0%
👀 fresh Agent Arena drop: Claude Fable 5.1 (Max) is the new #1, GPT-6 Astra (Max) right behind at #2
Anthropic holds 3 of the top 4. the crown keeps changing hands
via @arena https://t.co/VrX87XTRje
Jev classification details
Overall: Neutral89.0% confidence
The model is discussed in this dimension without a clear positive or negative opinion.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
9.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
91.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
0.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Neutral
89.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
100.0%
Speed
Not discussed
100.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Not discussed
100.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 64.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
neutralJev confidence 75.0%
@davelee What do you mean by "routed it to Fable 5.5"? Do you believe Fable 5.1 is already 5.5 underneath?
Jev classification details
Overall: Neutral75.0% confidence
The model is discussed in this dimension without a clear positive or negative opinion.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
0.0%
Negative
4.0%
Neutral
79.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
2.0%
Cannot determine
14.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Neutral
75.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
84.0%
Speed
Not discussed
99.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Not discussed
99.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 68.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
positiveJev confidence 65.0%
@DesignArena @OpenAI I don't trust ts there is no way that Astra beats opus 5.5 (or even fable 5.1) at ANY sort of web design or anything that requires taste. It's great at 3d modelling but that's it.
Jev classification details
Overall: Positive65.0% confidence
Praise, endorsement, or a favorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
71.0%
Negative
11.0%
Neutral
14.0%
Mixed
1.0%
Not discussed
2.0%
Cannot determine
1.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Positive
65.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
98.0%
Speed
Not discussed
100.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Not discussed
87.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 79.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
positiveJev confidence 40.0%
@a16z The top 1% is full of VCs using Fable 5.1 level of intelligence to do regular Power Point slides
Jev classification details
Overall: Positive40.0% confidence
Praise, endorsement, or a favorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
51.0%
Negative
40.0%
Neutral
2.0%
Mixed
4.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
3.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Positive
40.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
54.0%
Speed
Not discussed
100.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Not discussed
99.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 93.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
negativeJev confidence 72.0%
@Greg_TheBuilder Some users are getting rerouted when using fable 5.1
Jev classification details
Overall: Negative72.0% confidence
Criticism, disappointment, or an unfavorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
0.0%
Negative
77.0%
Neutral
21.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
2.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Negative
72.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
99.0%
Speed
Not discussed
100.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Not discussed
99.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 83.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
positiveJev confidence 44.0%
Build websites in minutes with powerful models like Fable 5.1 and GPT Astra 6, using your tokenized LLM Credits.
Turn your ideas into working websites, then deploy them with one click, directly from Accred.
Full walkthrough below.
https://t.co/zd4tju8w3t https://t.co/jV5fpL2nzR
Jev classification details
Overall: Positive44.0% confidence
Praise, endorsement, or a favorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
54.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
44.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
1.0%
Cannot determine
1.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Positive
44.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
100.0%
Speed
Not discussed
96.0%
Cost
Not discussed
96.0%
Coding
Positive
29.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 94.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
neutralJev confidence 86.0%
🔥 HOOK
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra 🤯
Two AI models. One goal: Create better. Think faster. Work smarter.
But which one would you choose? 👇
Save these 10 AI prompts and test them yourself. 🔖 https://t.co/gsE93rZiuP
Jev classification details
Overall: Neutral86.0% confidence
The model is discussed in this dimension without a clear positive or negative opinion.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
0.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
89.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
5.0%
Cannot determine
6.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Neutral
86.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
98.0%
Speed
Not discussed
94.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Not discussed
100.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 91.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
negativeJev confidence 81.0%
My Nous Pprtal sub renewed forgot I even had it, burnt the entire last months usage in one single Fable 5.1 test in 35 minutes 😂 least I can gets some other random models now , still haven’t forgiven my Claude for choosing it when it wasn’t supposed to
Jev classification details
Overall: Negative81.0% confidence
Criticism, disappointment, or an unfavorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
0.0%
Negative
84.0%
Neutral
11.0%
Mixed
3.0%
Not discussed
1.0%
Cannot determine
1.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Negative
81.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
92.0%
Speed
Not discussed
57.0%
Cost
Negative
65.0%
Coding
Not discussed
100.0%
Refers to Claude Fable 5.1Yes · 97.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
Page 1 of 12 · 143 mentions
1 of 1 enabled models have a recorded collection outcome with target 50 in the last 7 days. Search exhaustion and page limits can produce fewer records.Page limit reached · 44 / 50 accepted · page cap · Last successful collection Oct 4, 2026
Last collection attempt Oct 5, 2026 · partially completedNew analyses use TypeSafe Jev