The opinions, the patterns, and the posts behind them.
13 models tracked6 vendors · Source: X
143 classified mentions · 7 excluded (1 cannot determine)Newest post Oct 5, 2026
THE BIG PICTURE
How the conversation is changing
PositiveNegative
28%positive (40)
29%negative (42)
49 neutral · 12 mixedNo comparable previous period
Share of classified mentions · UTCCollected opinions, unweighted by likes or reposts
READ THE EVIDENCE
In their own words
neutralJev confidence 81.0%
🗓️ Oct 5 · 🤯 Frontier AI for pennies:
GLM 5.3 Flash → 97% off
Grok 4.7 → 78% off
Claude Opus 5.5 → 65% off
Claude Sonnet 5.5 → 62% off
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash → 48% off
GPT-6.1 Sol → 40% off
That's 65% off on average.
Every top model. One API. Pay with crypto. https://t.co/jFf8Opk1aX
Jev classification details
Overall: Neutral81.0% confidence
The model is discussed in this dimension without a clear positive or negative opinion.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
13.0%
Negative
1.0%
Neutral
85.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
1.0%
Cannot determine
0.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Neutral
81.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
100.0%
Speed
Not discussed
100.0%
Cost
Neutral
71.0%
Coding
Not discussed
100.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 100.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
neutralJev confidence 39.0%
Sonnet 5.5 Vs GPT-6.1-Sol.
Neck to Neck 😅😅 https://t.co/xjk2tjVGlS
Jev classification details
Overall: Neutral39.0% confidence
The model is discussed in this dimension without a clear positive or negative opinion.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
29.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
50.0%
Mixed
1.0%
Not discussed
1.0%
Cannot determine
19.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Neutral
39.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
90.0%
Speed
Not discussed
96.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Not discussed
95.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 79.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
positiveJev confidence 85.0%
OpenAI shelved GPT-6.1 Astra.
Shipped GPT-6.1 Sol: near-Astra at 1/5 Astra's token price.
Same window: Anthropic pushed a faster Sonnet that's cheaper per task.
Capability isn't scarce.
Trust + unit economics are.
"Wait for the next frontier drop" is the wrong variable.
Jev classification details
Overall: Positive85.0% confidence
Praise, endorsement, or a favorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
87.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
2.0%
Mixed
11.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
0.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Positive
85.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
99.0%
Speed
Not discussed
99.0%
Cost
Positive
100.0%
Coding
Not discussed
100.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 99.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
mixedJev confidence 93.0%
Say whatever you want about openAI, you can absolutely abuse GPT 6.1 Sol on Ultra and it still feels infinite. It does stray of course and do stuff you didn't ask it, but overall very very solid model!
Jev classification details
Overall: Mixed93.0% confidence
Both benefits and drawbacks are expressed about the same model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
6.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
0.0%
Mixed
94.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
0.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Mixed
93.0%
Reasoning
Mixed
42.0%
Speed
Not discussed
96.0%
Cost
Not discussed
99.0%
Coding
Not discussed
99.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 90.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
neutralJev confidence 90.0%
OpenAI Unveils Dots, 24/7 Agents, and the GPT-6.1 Sol Model - Brief IA https://t.co/QqB3Dklkg0
Jev classification details
Overall: Neutral90.0% confidence
The model is discussed in this dimension without a clear positive or negative opinion.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
0.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
92.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
4.0%
Cannot determine
4.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Neutral
90.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
97.0%
Speed
Not discussed
98.0%
Cost
Not discussed
98.0%
Coding
Not discussed
96.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 99.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
negativeJev confidence 69.0%
2/ And the price page is moving under you. GPT-6.1 Sol: above 272K input tokens/request, the whole request rebills at $4 in / $15 out. Not the overflow — the whole request. (OpenAI, Sep 29, 2026)
Jev classification details
Overall: Negative69.0% confidence
Criticism, disappointment, or an unfavorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
0.0%
Negative
75.0%
Neutral
25.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
0.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Negative
69.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
100.0%
Speed
Not discussed
100.0%
Cost
Negative
45.0%
Coding
Not discussed
100.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 97.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
neutralJev confidence 87.0%
@TJeparskis The rationing is real, but it points at subscriptions more than at the industry. Per-token API prices fell this month: Opus 5.5 launched about 40% cheaper than Opus 5, and OpenAI says GPT-6.1 Sol matches Astra at $2/$10. What's breaking is flat-rate plans meeting agent workloads.
Jev classification details
Overall: Neutral87.0% confidence
The model is discussed in this dimension without a clear positive or negative opinion.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
4.0%
Negative
3.0%
Neutral
89.0%
Mixed
2.0%
Not discussed
1.0%
Cannot determine
1.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Neutral
87.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
100.0%
Speed
Not discussed
100.0%
Cost
Neutral
74.0%
Coding
Not discussed
100.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 97.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
mixedJev confidence 96.0%
@AnmolSriva60062 GPT 6.1 Sol… cheap but slow.
Jev classification details
Overall: Mixed96.0% confidence
Both benefits and drawbacks are expressed about the same model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
0.0%
Negative
3.0%
Neutral
0.0%
Mixed
97.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
0.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Mixed
96.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
99.0%
Speed
Negative
100.0%
Cost
Positive
96.0%
Coding
Not discussed
100.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 96.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
negativeJev confidence 49.0%
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol same plush octopus challenge. 🐙
Both built the whole thing in-browser with WebGPU, code, soft-body physics, and combable fur.
But Opus came out fluffier, livelier… and cheaper.
Estimated API cost:
Opus: $15.21 Sol: $18.03
Plot twist: the more https://t.co/dG5vxRGwZ9
Jev classification details
Overall: Negative49.0% confidence
Criticism, disappointment, or an unfavorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
0.0%
Negative
57.0%
Neutral
0.0%
Mixed
40.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
3.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Negative
49.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
97.0%
Speed
Not discussed
99.0%
Cost
Negative
81.0%
Coding
Neutral
36.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 98.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
negativeJev confidence 62.0%
@TokenGremlin So if I send him a source snippet, he'll write it as GPT 6.1 Sol? That was a problem at Anthropic too.
Jev classification details
Overall: Negative62.0% confidence
Criticism, disappointment, or an unfavorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
0.0%
Negative
68.0%
Neutral
20.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
2.0%
Cannot determine
9.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Negative
62.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
82.0%
Speed
Not discussed
100.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Not discussed
31.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 45.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
neutralJev confidence 71.0%
𝗚𝗣𝗧-𝟲.𝟭 𝗦𝗢𝗟 𝗜𝗦 𝗡𝗢𝗪 𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘 𝗢𝗡 𝗕.𝗔𝗜 ⚡🤖
https://t.co/deN1L4koHv is expanding its AI infrastructure with GPT-6.1 Sol—a model designed to bring advanced reasoning and agentic capabilities closer to practical professional workflows.
The interesting part isn't https://t.co/T78l1T3aDC
Jev classification details
Overall: Neutral71.0% confidence
The model is discussed in this dimension without a clear positive or negative opinion.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
17.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
76.0%
Mixed
0.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
7.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Neutral
71.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
90.0%
Speed
Not discussed
99.0%
Cost
Not discussed
100.0%
Coding
Not discussed
99.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 99.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
positiveJev confidence 91.0%
Amazon Bedrock agents now run OpenAI models with AWS-native execution. Self-hosted or managed runtime, your permissions.
GPT-6.1 Sol: 1/5 the cost of Astra for agentic work. Astra UltraFast: 300 tokens/sec. 🔥
#GenerativeAI #AWSBedrock
https://t.co/PB7jMrnjyk
Jev classification details
Overall: Positive91.0% confidence
Praise, endorsement, or a favorable opinion about the model in this dimension.
Confidence is Jev’s estimate, not verified accuracy. These are the saved classification results; Jev does not provide a written explanation for this post.
Overall label probabilities
Positive
92.0%
Negative
0.0%
Neutral
6.0%
Mixed
1.0%
Not discussed
0.0%
Cannot determine
1.0%
Jev’s category decisions
Dimension
Sentiment
Confidence
Overall
Positive
91.0%
Reasoning
Not discussed
100.0%
Speed
Not discussed
92.0%
Cost
Positive
98.0%
Coding
Not discussed
100.0%
Refers to GPT-6.1 SolYes · 99.0% confidence
jev-sentiment-v4/jev-1.13.0Classified Oct 5, 2026 · UTC
Page 1 of 12 · 143 mentions
1 of 1 enabled models have a recorded collection outcome with target 50 in the last 7 days. Search exhaustion and page limits can produce fewer records.Page limit reached · 46 / 50 accepted · page cap · Last successful collection Oct 4, 2026
Last collection attempt Oct 5, 2026 · partially completedNew analyses use TypeSafe Jev